In the aftermath of the battle of Kosovo in 1389, the Turks were so mad about the death of their Sultan that they scoured the battlefield for Christian corpses to mutilate in a specific way that is grossly pornographic in nature. It is possible that the world’s worst known method of torture came about as an offshoot of this Asiatic-Islamic practice of stuffing the mouths of the corpses of the dead men on the battlefield with their own death-erection genitalia in order to express a complete victory over the fallen foe in the form of an ugly humiliation, not too much unlike the motive behind the bestial mutilation of General Custer’s troops after the Battle of the Little Big Horn (although the Indians did not go as far as the Muslims did). There has been a peculiar feature of the political history of Islam as a state tool of occupation of conquered lands going back at least a thousand years. Its purpose – surprise-surprise! – is to inflict maximum terror on both the victim and the sympathetic observer. If you will remember anything about the historical significance of Islam (its political effect), then remember this, namely, that over the centuries no faith, no body of ideas, no society of practitioners of beliefs other than those of Islam under Islam’s badge of pride has been killing the Westerners and attacking the symbols of Western life with poignant hate and deliberate intent to destroy the West for being itself.
So the fact remains that only in the name of Islam were the ugliest acts of evil committed against the West and on a persistent basis. Only among Muslims was such incipient opposition and hate against the West in general ever detected in the annals of history, out of all the groups that ever opposed the Western expansion and Western life. Not even the most determined enemies like the Japanese in WW2 or the Russians in the Cold War had been pressed into a universal war against the West for cosmic reasons of Manichaean existentialist survival! No enemy has ever been sporting the beheadings of Western humanists or parading kids strapped with explosives on a suicide mission against the West. Even the surviving Nazis easily blended into the postwar order without any further acts of opposition.
One way in which we can measure this determination to oppose those who are insubordinate to an Islamic world-state is the method of punishment or torture and execution. There were other methods over the ages. The ancient Chinese “death by a thousand cuts” or the Spanish Inquisition’s “Iron Maiden” and rack-and-pinion stretching of bodies, though painful, seem almost polite by comparison with what follows. If ISIS tortures seen on the television were horrible enough, and memorable enough because of the nobility of their Western victims whose good will to help even the Muslims in need was rewarded by the publicly televised slaughters at the hands of the infamous scoundrel Jihadi John, a British-born and British-raised Arab terrorist fanatic, whose real name was Mohammed Emwazi of Kuwait, then you missed the lynchpin of the story. Even his horrible acts were a child’s play in comparison with the classic Muslim science of the most pathological methods of torture ever devised on planet Earth in the annals of recorded history. Besides these, the famous Ancient Roman torture and execution method of crucifixion appears like an Islamic torture school’s junior apprentice’s playpen innovation. So, what are we talking about? A group of scientifically developed techniques of torture of humans satisfying the following criteria: 1) to take away the dignity from the defeated foe, 2) the victim’s survivability under the most gruesome conditions of greatest agony, 3) what can be the most humiliating way to destroy a person? (hint: rape) 4) inflicting as rich a pain as possible for as long as possible, and 5) acts as terrifying and as degrading to both the victim and the public observing him as possible. The answer: a group of torturous executions requiring special training and long preparation, almost under laboratory conditions. This method was known over the centuries as the dreaded “Khazouk” in Turkish. Who ever said that in the world of Islam science of any kind is discouraged?
The result of this mandate to develop the world’s worst torture and execution method for maximum effect of terror to force into submission a population was a group of tortures centered around the longitudinal impalement technique. Though it looks likely that the Asiatic fighters, chiefly the Turks, whom the Arabs employed as enforcers for their domestic disputes, introduced the idea of impalement (which could have been inspired by the subculture of rape in the World of Islam). For centuries the Turks and their Islamic world-state centered in Istanbul have been refining the science of longitudinal impalement as an extremely effective terror method with which any insubordinate population could be brought to heel and made to cooperate on anything. It has become a feature of folklore and oral myth-making by ethnic and religious groups all around the eastern Mediterranean, among the Syrians, the Serbs, the Greeks, the North Africans, etc. This method was applied by the Islamic state on insubordinate Muslims, too, although the volume of evidence from history points at chiefly Christian victims.
The technology behind this method may seem primitive, but the anatomical understanding of the human body had to be quite high and well developed in order for this method of death through an incredibly diverse pain, humiliation, and agony of unimaginable discomfort to be successful and effective for its purpose. Some countries in which these methods were applied are Egypt, Syria/Lebanon, Iraq, Turkey, Crimea, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, etc. Vlad the Impaler, a Romanian prince, influenced by this Turkish method, tried to counter with his own terror, however, his impalement fell far short of the real thing. He was merely impaling in a very simple way the captured Turks, the plundered German colonists, or dead corpses in general (using a pike coming through the front of the stomach and exiting in the back) which is the simplest form of impalement. A Croatian writer by the name of Ivo Andric, the only Yugoslav to ever receive a Nobel Prize, described vividly the longitudinal impalement method of execution with which the Turks and their Bosnian allies attacked a disobeying Bosnian Christian to make an example out of him on the river Drina bridge. In another famous example, at the siege of Constantinople in 1453, the brave captain of the Venetian galleon that broke through the Turkish naval blockade to come to the aid of the beleaguered Christians stuck inside Constantinople’s walls was captured after the Turkish cannon managed to sink his fast ship. The Sultan’s outrage demanded that the captured navigator and captain be turned over to the Islamic torture department of his Turkish Islamic state in order to terrify both those Christians outside the siege area and those inside the besieged city. So, on the banks of the Strait of Bosphorus facing Constantinople the hapless captain Antonio Rizzo was longitudinally impaled. During the many centuries of Turkish Islamic State’s dictatorship over a significant part of the globe, if a Christian spoke or acted out against the “Law of Mohammed”, or consorted with a Turkish woman, or broke into a mosque, then he might face the world’s worst death by torture (unless he converted to Islam straight away).
This is how a Frenchman who witnessed in Egypt the application of the world’s worst method of execution described it:
“They lay the [shivering] Malefactor upon his Belly, with his Hands tied behind his Back, then they slit up his Fundament [anal cavity] with a Razor, and throw into it a handful of Paste that they have in readiness, which immediately stops the Blood. After that they thrust up into his Body a very long Stake as big as a Mans Arm, sharp at the point and tapered, which they grease a little before; when they have driven it in with a Mallet, till it come out at his Breast, or at his Head or Shoulders, they lift him up, and plant this Stake very streight in the Ground, upon which they leave him so exposed for a day. One day I saw a Man upon the Pale, who was Sentenced to continue so for three Hours alive and that he might not die too soon, the Stake was not thrust up far enough to come out at any part of his Body, and they also put a stay or rest upon the Pale, to hinder the weight of his body from making him sink down upon it, or the point of it from piercing him through, which would have presently killed him: In this manner he was left for some Hours, (during which time he spoke) and turning from one side to another, prayed those that passed by to kill him, making a thousand wry Mouths and Faces, because of the pain be suffered when he stirred himself, but after Dinner the Pasha [a local Islamic overlord] sent one to dispatch him; which was easily done, by making the point of the Stake come out at his Breast, and then he was left till next Morning, when he was taken down, because he stunk horridly.”
Some tools required for the preparation of this are: knowledge of the human anatomy and where the various vital organs of the body are, special chemical paste with which to reduce or stop bleeding, a bucket of lard, a 6 to 9 feet tall pike tapered to a very blunt point at one end, a team of muscle men, a big mallet, a complete psychopath (educated about the human anatomy) who will drive the leading edge of the shaft of the stake (or the pike) into the sweaty and shivering body of the spread-out victim tied or held down on a table, a town square or a prominent hill, and an official order from an Islamic authority (either local or global). The amazing thing about this difficult torture method is that a long pole could be made to travel through the living body (through the anus and out through the skin of the back above the right side of the chest) without killing the victim. And then, such a shishkebab-ed victim would have to be lifted up from a horizontal position and placed vertically into a hole in the ground that will hold the base of the stick that impaled him, so he can linger on top of it for days, exposed to the praying birds and shocked sights of people passing by. Oftentimes, the victim would moan for days and nights begging for a quick death. There also was a variation on this method whereby a searing hot iron pike was used instead for anal penetration and passage through the torso.
Be that as it may, one thing is for sure – there will be plenty of Jihadi Johns in the future that would gladly take up the latest call to reinstitute the KAZOUK.
By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)If you think ISIS’s killing methods are bad wait till you see what one video in Arabic done by a Muslim lady dressed in a Hijab circulated to Muslims worldwide. The video was a complaint to Caliph al-Baghdadi of ISIS as “the call of Muslim mothers” arguing that such methods as “beheading” and “shooting” are just too humane and will not work to stop the U.S. led coalition air raids which she complained that this is persecution against her living in Syria. To eliminate the attacks she suggested that an Ottoman method of execution be used to detract pilots from joining the coalition against ISIS.She suggested to use the captured Jordanian pilot Moaz Kasasbeh and begged not to execute him mercifully by using a bullet or a knife, but begged them to reinstitute the Khazouk.Everyone in the Middle East knows three things told to them by their grand parents about the Ottoman Turks and what they spread throughout the Middle East: Sihr“sorcery,” Baksheesh “bribery”, and the Khazouk which is a spike driven through the victim’s rectum, which the Ottomans used to terrify locals and deter potential insurgents. And this is exactly what this lady wanted to reinstitute: “Are you going to execute him with a merciful bullet? Or are you going to execute him with a merciful knife?” she asks.
Khawiskou “impale him” she cries out “then send him to his mother” she added.
“Why are the Arab world fighting us. We are Muslim doing the will of Allah”.
“I am pleading [ISIS] to honor my special request that you Khazouk him “impale him” and post it all over the social networks and the media”.
One TV series and in order to thwart neo-Ottoman expansion reminds how horrific this type of execution was.
As we learned in school, the Ottomans were creative when it came to all sorts of weirdities. At times they used the hot poker, a red hot metal rod that is inserted through the anus which the expert executioner is able to avoid puncturing the heart and the victim could live up to two days before he dies since the bleeding is minimized as the hot rod cauterizes the wound.
But as it seems, some are begging to revive the Khazouk in revenge against the U.S. led coalition pilots. But to this lady, the Khazouk is no fantasy, she is serious.
The West does not understand such tradition as a Muslim woman making such an appeal.
Here, let me explain it all. In Ibn Athīr’s famous history book al-Kāmil, he mentions the story in our history of a King called al-Mu’tasim, who was from the Banū ‘Abbas. The event goes like this; A Muslim woman was captured by the Romans and imprisoned, so the Romans laughed at her. The leader of the Roman king sarcastically said, “You won’t ever leave this place until the muslim king himself removes you from these shackles.”
The woman shouted “Wa Mu’tasima!” [Oh my grief, Mu’tasima!]. The Roman King laughed at her and said: “He will never come to save you unless he was riding “ablaq” a black and white horse. He said this in a way of mocking her and showing the impossibility of the situation.
When al-Mu’tasim heard of the news, he gathered a whole army and made the entire army ride the “ablaq” horses and defeated the Romans (who in this case are viewed as the U.S. and Europeans) and himself entered the prison where the Muslim woman had been imprisoned. “Who are you?” she said.”I am al-Mu’tasim.” He freed her from her shackles, a sign of humiliation for the Romans.
And this became the issue that when a Muslim woman calls upon the Caliph for help he must comply. The Muslims always use this story al-Mu’tasim, a call of a Muslim woman’s appeal in Jihad must be honored and in this case, the hot poker.
Jihadi John in his true element.